A- de 2005
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil
✓Claimant Carlos Arturo Marin Carmona
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia en la Corte Constitucional por ser competencia del juez de primera instancia
- Competencia para conocer incidente de desacato
- Deber de notificar al Juez o Tribunal competente de primera instancia
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (5 points)
- R E S U E L V E:
- Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud formulada por el señor Carlos Arturo Marín Carmona, accionante en el aludido proceso de tutela, por medio del cual informa a esta Sala de Revisión "que hasta el recibo de este documento, no ha existido ACATAMIENTO por parte de EMCALI EICE ESP a la decisión judicial emitida en sentencia T-256/2003, numeral
- segundo. (...)."
- Segundo. Por Secretaría General, REMÍTASE el escrito junto con sus anexos al Juzgado
- Cuarto. Penal Municipal de Cali, para que éste proceda según su competencia. Igualmente COMUNÍQUESE lo aquí resuelto al peticionario.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.